Cookies
We need your consent to use the individual data so that you can see information about your interests, among other things. Click "OK" to give your consent.
ASTM D3884-22
Standard Guide for Abrasion Resistance of Textile Fabrics (Rotary Platform Abrader Method)
Translate name
STANDARD published on 1.6.2022
The information about the standard:
Designation standards: ASTM D3884-22
Publication date standards: 1.6.2022
SKU: NS-1066981
The number of pages: 8
Approximate weight : 24 g (0.05 lbs)
Country: American technical standard
Category: Technical standards ASTM
The category - similar standards:
Annotation of standard text ASTM D3884-22 :
Keywords:
abrader, abrasion, rotary platform, textile fabric,, ICS Number Code 59.080.30 (Textile fabrics)
Additional information
| Significance and Use | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
5.1?The measurement of the resistance to abrasion of textile and other materials is very complex and may be affected by a number of factors, including: 5.1.1?The inherent mechanical properties of the fibers; the dimensions of the fibers; the structure of the yarns; the construction of the fabrics; and the type, kind, and amount of finishing material added to the fibers, yarns, or fabric. 5.1.2?The conditions of the tests, such as the nature of abradant, variable action of the abradant over the area of specimen abraded, the tension of the specimen, the pressure between the specimen and abradant, and the dimensional changes in the specimens. 5.1.3?Changes in the abradant during specific tests. Note 2:?The abradant must accordingly be discarded at frequent
intervals or checked periodically against a standard. With
disposable abradants, the abradant is used only once or discarded
after limited use. With permanent abradants that use hardened metal
or equivalent surfaces, it is assumed that the abradant will not
change appreciably in a specific series of tests. Similar abradants
used in different laboratories will not change at the same rate,
due to differences in usage. Permanent abradants may also change
due to pick up of finishing or other material from test fabrics and
must accordingly be cleaned at frequent intervals.
5.1.4?The method of evaluation, which may be influenced by the judgment of the operator. 5.2?The resistance of textile materials to abrasion as measured on a testing machine in the laboratory is generally only one of several factors contributing to wear performance or durability as experienced in the actual use of the material. While abrasion resistance (often stated in terms of the number of cycles on a specified machine, using a specified technique to produce a specified degree or amount of abrasion) and durability (defined as the ability to withstand deterioration or wearing out in use, including the effects of abrasion) are frequently related, the relationship varies with different end uses, and different factors may be necessary in any calculation of predicted durability from specific abrasion data. Laboratory tests may be reliable as an indication of relative end-use performance in cases where the difference in abrasion resistance of various materials is large, but they should not be relied upon where differences in laboratory test findings are small. In general, they should not be relied upon for prediction of actual wear-life in specific end uses unless there are data showing the specific relationship between laboratory abrasion tests and actual wear in the intended end-use. 5.3?Before definite predictions of fabric usefulness can be drawn from an abrasion test as made on the rotary platform abrader (Fig. 1), actual end-use trials should be conducted and related to the abrasion test. Different types of wear (for example, wear on men's clothing at cuffs, crotch, etc.) may correspond to different ratings of the rotary platform abrader test. FIG. 1 Rotary Platform Abrader Note 1:?Vacuum suction system not shown.
5.3.1?In making a comparison of different fabrics (that is, of different fibers, weights, etc.) the rotary platform abrader test will not always reveal a difference known to exist when the fabrics are actually used. Therefore, end-use trials should be conducted in conjunction with the abrasion test, at least as a guide for future testing of these fabrics. 5.3.2?Uncontrolled manufacturing or finishing variations occurring within a fabric or within lots of the same style of fabric can, however, be detected satisfactorily with the rotary platform abrader tester. 5.4?These general observations apply to all types of fabrics, including woven, nonwoven, and knit apparel fabrics, household fabrics, industrial fabrics, and floor coverings. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1. Scope | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1.1?This guide covers the determination of the abrasion resistance of textile fabrics using the rotary platform abrader. Note 1:?Other procedures for measuring the abrasion resistance
of textile fabrics are given in Test Methods D3389, D3885, D3886, D4157, D4158, D4685, D4966, and AATCC 93. To determine the
abrasion resistance of leather, refer to Test Method D7255.
1.2?The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. No other units of measurement are included in this standard. 1.2.1?ExceptionEnglish units are used when referencing rotational speed. 1.3?This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. 1.4?This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2. Referenced Documents | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
