We need your consent to use the individual data so that you can see information about your interests, among other things. Click "OK" to give your consent.
Standard Test Method for High-Voltage, Low-Current, Dry Arc Resistance of Solid Electrical Insulation
Translate name
STANDARD published on 15.1.2022
Designation standards: ASTM D495-22
Publication date standards: 15.1.2022
SKU: NS-1049012
The number of pages: 11
Approximate weight : 33 g (0.07 lbs)
Country: American technical standard
Category: Technical standards ASTM
Keywords:
arc resistance, dry arc resistance, high voltage, low current, stainless steel electrodes, tungsten rod electrodes,, ICS Number Code 29.035.01 (Insulating materials in general)
Significance and Use | ||||||||||
4.1?The
high-voltage, low-current type of arc resistance test is intended
to simulate only approximately such service 4.2?In order to distinguish more easily among materials that have low arc resistance, the early stages of this test method are mild, and the later stages are successively more severe. The arc occurs intermittently between two electrodes resting on the surface of the specimen, in normal or inverted orientation. The severity is increased in the early stages by successively decreasing to zero the interval between flashes of uniform duration, and in later stages by increasing the current. 4.3?Four general types of failure have been observed: 4.3.1?Many inorganic dielectrics become incandescent, whereupon they are capable of conducting the current. Upon cooling, however, they return to their earlier insulating condition. 4.3.2?Some organic compounds burst into flame without the formation of a visible conducting path in the substance. 4.3.3?Others are seen to fail by tracking, that is, a thin wiry line is formed between the electrodes. 4.3.4?The fourth type occurs by carbonization of the surface until sufficient carbon is present to carry the current. 4.4?Materials often fail within the first few seconds after a change in the severity stage. When comparing the arc resistance of materials, much more weight shall be given to a few seconds that overlap two stages than to the same elapsed time within a stage. Thus, there is a much greater difference in arc resistance between 178 and 182 s than between 174 and 178 s. Note 4:?Some investigators have reported attempts to
characterize the remaining insulating value of the damaged area
after failure by allowing the specimen to cool to room temperature,
without disturbance of the original position of the electrodes, and
then either (1) measuring the insulation resistance between the
electrodes or (2) determining the percentage of breakdown voltage
remaining relative to that obtained on an undamaged area of the
specimen. A recommended circuit arrangement and test procedure for
carrying out the second of these two means of characterizing the
remaining insulating value of the damaged area is described in
Appendix X1. Still another,
and obvious, method of reevaluating the damaged area after failure
is to repeat the arc resistance test after the specimen has cooled,
with the electrodes undisturbed from their original positions.
However, keep in mind that none of these methods will be
universally applicable because of the severe physical damage to the
test area in many instances.
|
||||||||||
1. Scope | ||||||||||
1.1?This test method covers, in a preliminary fashion, the differentiation of similar materials resistance to the action of a high-voltage, low-current arc close to the surface of insulation, when a conducting path is formed causing the material to become conducting due to the localized thermal and chemical decomposition and erosion. 1.2?The usefulness of this test method is very severely limited by many restrictions and qualifications, some of which are described in the following paragraphs and in Section 5. Generally, this test method shall 1.3?This test method will not, in general, permit conclusions to be drawn concerning the relative arc resistance rankings of materials that are potentially subjected to other types of arcs: for example, high voltage at high currents, and low voltage at low or high currents (promoted by surges or by conducting contaminants). 1.4?The test method is intended, because of its convenience and the short time required for testing, for preliminary screening of material, for detecting the effects of changes in formulation, and for quality control testing after correlation has been established with other types of simulated service arc tests and field experience. Because this test method is usually conducted under clean and dry laboratory conditions rarely encountered in practice, it is possible that the prediction of a material's relative performance in typical applications and in varying clean to dirty environments will be substantially altered (Note 1). Caution is urged against drawing strong conclusions without corroborating support of simulated service tests and field testing. Rather, this test method is useful for preliminary evaluation of changes in structure and composition without the complicating influence of environmental conditions, especially dirt and moisture. Note 1:?By changing some of the circuit conditions described
herein it has been found possible to rearrange markedly the order
of arc resistance of a group of organic insulating materials
consisting of vulcanized fiber and of molded phenolic and amino
plastics, some containing organic, and some inorganic,
filler.
1.5?While this test method uses dry, uncontaminated specimen surfaces, Test Method D2132, Test Methods D2303, and Test Method D3638 employ wet, contaminated specimen surfaces. Their use is recommended for engineering purposes and to assist in establishing some degree of significance to this test method for quality control purposes.2 1.6?This test method is not applicable to materials that do not produce conductive paths under the action of an electric arc, or that melt or form fluid residues that float conductive residues out of the active test area thereby preventing formation of a conductive path. 1.7?The values stated in inch-pound units are to be regarded as standard. The values given in parentheses are mathematical conversions to SI units that are provided for information only and are not considered standard. 1.8?This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. Note 2:?Due to the deficiencies covered in Section 1, Committee D09 has proposed that without significant proposed improvements this standard be withdrawn in 2027 during its next 5 year review. This notice is provided so that referencing standards can transition. 1.9?This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee. |
||||||||||
2. Referenced Documents | ||||||||||
|
Do you want to make sure you use only the valid technical standards?
We can offer you a solution which will provide you a monthly overview concerning the updating of standards which you use.
Would you like to know more? Look at this page.
Latest update: 2024-11-21 (Number of items: 2 206 478)
© Copyright 2024 NORMSERVIS s.r.o.