We need your consent to use the individual data so that you can see information about your interests, among other things. Click "OK" to give your consent.
Standard Practice for Eddy-Current Examination of Steel Tubular Products Using Magnetic Saturation
STANDARD published on 15.2.2011
Designation standards: ASTM E309-11
Note: WITHDRAWN
Publication date standards: 15.2.2011
SKU: NS-46361
The number of pages: 6
Approximate weight : 18 g (0.04 lbs)
Country: American technical standard
Category: Technical standards ASTM
Keywords:
discontinuity, encircling coil, ferromagnetic pipe, ferromagnetic tubing, magnetic saturation system, magnetizing field strength, probe coil, tube, tubular product, Steel pipe (nondestructive testing), Steel tube (nondestructive testing), Structural steel (SS) tube, Tubular products, Discontinuities--metals/alloys, Eddy current examination, Electromagnetic (eddy current) testing, Encircling coil method, Ferromagnetic pipe/tube, Magnetic saturation (MS), Nondestructive evaluation (NDE)
Significance and Use | ||||
The purpose of this practice is to outline a procedure for the detection and location of discontinuities such as pits, voids, inclusions, cracks, or abrupt dimensional variations in ferromagnetic tubing using the electromagnetic (eddy-current) method. Furthermore, the relative severity of a discontinuity may be indicated, and a rejection level may be set with respect to the magnitude of the indication. The response from natural discontinuities can be significantly different than that from artificial discontinuities such as drilled holes or notches. For this reason, sufficient work should be done to establish the sensitivity level and set-up required to detect natural discontinuities of consequence to the end use of the product. Eddy-current testing systems are generally not sensitive to discontinuities adjacent to the ends of the tube. The extent of the end effect region can be determined in accordance with 8.6. Since the density of eddy currents decreases nearly exponentially as the distance from the external surface increases, the response to deep-seated discontinuities decreases and some deep-seated discontinuities may give no detectable repsonse. Discontinuity orientation also affects the system response and should be taken into consideration when establishing the examination sensitivity. In preparing a reference standard for welded tubing, artificial discontinuities should be placed in both the weld metal and the parent metal when the responses are expected to be different and if both are to be examined. The apparatus is then adjusted to obtain an optimum signal-to-noise ratio. When examining only the weld area, the discontinuities shall be placed only in the weld area. The examination frequency and the type of apparatus being used should be considered when choosing the examining speed. Certain types of equipment are effective only over a given speed range; therefore, the examining speed should fall within this range. Discontinuities such as scratches or seams that are continuous and uniform over the full length of the tube may not always be detected with differential encircling coils or probes scanned along the tube length. |
||||
1. Scope | ||||
1.1 This practice covers a procedure for applying the eddy-current method to detect discontinuities in ferromagnetic pipe and tubing (Note 1) where the article being examined is rendered substantially non-magnetic by the application of a concentrated, strong magnetic field in the region adjacent to the examining coil. Note 1—For convenience, the term tube or tubular product will hereafter be used to refer to both pipe and tubing. 1.2 The procedure is specifically applicable to eddy-current testing methods using an encircling-coil assembly. However, eddy-current techniques that employ either fixed or rotating probe-coil assemblies may be used to either enhance discontinuity sensitivity on the large diameter tubular products or to maximize the response received from a particular type of discontinuity. 1.3 This practice is intended for use on tubular products having outside diameters from approximately 1/4 to 10 in. (6.35 to 254.0 mm). These techniques have been used for smaller and larger sizes however, and may be specified upon contractual agreement between the purchaser and the supplier. 1.4 This practice does not establish acceptance criteria; they must be specified by the using party or parties. 1.5 The values stated in inch-pound units are to be regarded as standard. The values given in parentheses are mathematical conversions to SI units that are provided for information only and are not considered standard. |
||||
2. Referenced Documents | ||||
|
Historical
1.5.2013
Historical
1.3.2012
Historical
1.10.2009
Historical
1.3.2008
Historical
1.5.2014
Historical
1.12.2010
Do you want to make sure you use only the valid technical standards?
We can offer you a solution which will provide you a monthly overview concerning the updating of standards which you use.
Would you like to know more? Look at this page.
Latest update: 2024-12-13 (Number of items: 2 215 533)
© Copyright 2024 NORMSERVIS s.r.o.