We need your consent to use the individual data so that you can see information about your interests, among other things. Click "OK" to give your consent.
Standard Practice for Fracture Testing with Surface-Crack Tension Specimens (Includes all amendments And changes 10/5/2016).
Automatically translated name:
Standard Practice for Fracture Testing with Surface-Crack Tension Specimens
STANDARD published on 1.10.2010
Designation standards: ASTM E740/E740M-03(2010)e2
Note: WITHDRAWN
Publication date standards: 1.10.2010
SKU: NS-47859
The number of pages: 9
Approximate weight : 27 g (0.06 lbs)
Country: American technical standard
Category: Technical standards ASTM
Keywords:
residual strength, surface crack, tensile force, ICS Number Code 77.040.10 (Mechanical testing of metals)
Significance and Use | ||||||||||||||
The surface-crack tension (SCT) test is used to estimate the load-carrying capacity of simple sheet- or plate-like structural components having a type of flaw likely to occur in service. The test is also used for research purposes to investigate failure mechanisms of cracks under service conditions. The residual strength of an SCT specimen is a function of the crack depth and length and the specimen thickness as well as the characteristics of the material. This relationship is extremely complex and cannot be completely described or characterized at present. The results of the SCT test are suitable for direct application to design only when the service conditions exactly parallel the test conditions. Some methods for further analysis are suggested in Appendix X1. In order that SCT test data can be comparable and reproducible and can be correlated among laboratories, it is essential that uniform SCT testing practices be established. The specimen configuration, preparation, and instrumentation described in this practice are generally suitable for cyclic- or sustained-force testing as well. However, certain constraints are peculiar to each of these tests. These are beyond the scope of this practice but are discussed in Ref. (1). |
||||||||||||||
1. Scope | ||||||||||||||
1.1 This practice covers the design, preparation, and testing of surface-crack tension (SCT) specimens. It relates specifically to testing under continuously increasing force and excludes cyclic and sustained loadings. The quantity determined is the residual strength of a specimen having a semielliptical or circular-segment fatigue crack in one surface. This value depends on the crack dimensions and the specimen thickness as well as the characteristics of the material. 1.2 Metallic materials that can be tested are not limited by strength, thickness, or toughness. However, tests of thick specimens of tough materials may require a tension test machine of extremely high capacity. The applicability of this practice to nonmetallic materials has not been determined. 1.3 This practice is limited to specimens having a uniform rectangular cross section in the test section. The test section width and length must be large with respect to the crack length. Crack depth and length should be chosen to suit the ultimate purpose of the test. 1.4 Residual strength may depend strongly upon temperature within a certain range depending upon the characteristics of the material. This practice is suitable for tests at any appropriate temperature. 1.5 Residual strength is believed to be relatively insensitive to loading rate within the range normally used in conventional tension tests. When very low or very high rates of loading are expected in service, the effect of loading rate should be investigated using special procedures that are beyond the scope of this practice. Note 1—Further information on background and need for this type of test is given in the report of ASTM Task Group E24.01.05 on Part-Through-Crack Testing (1). 1.6 The values stated in either SI units or inch-pound units are to be regarded separately as standard. The values stated in each system may not be exact equivalents; therefore, each system shall be used independently of the other. Combining values from the two systems may result in non-conformance with the standard. 1.7 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. |
||||||||||||||
2. Referenced Documents | ||||||||||||||
|
Historical
1.11.2007
Historical
1.5.2014
Historical
1.10.2011
Historical
1.11.2010
Historical
1.11.2010
Historical
1.9.2008
Do you want to be sure about the validity of used regulations?
We offer you a solution so that you could use valid and updated legislative regulations.
Would you like to get more information? Look at this page.
Latest update: 2024-11-22 (Number of items: 2 206 568)
© Copyright 2024 NORMSERVIS s.r.o.