We need your consent to use the individual data so that you can see information about your interests, among other things. Click "OK" to give your consent.
Standard Test Method for Wear Testing of Polymeric Materials Used in Total Joint Prostheses
STANDARD published on 1.6.2011
Designation standards: ASTM F732-00(2011)
Note: WITHDRAWN
Publication date standards: 1.6.2011
SKU: NS-56279
The number of pages: 11
Approximate weight : 33 g (0.07 lbs)
Country: American technical standard
Category: Technical standards ASTM
Keywords:
joint prosthesis materials, pin-on-disk, wear testing, Fixed-bearing ball-cup wear applications, Hip replacement prosthesis, &ldquo,Hip-type&rdquo, wear test, Delamination, Joint prostheses, Laboratory testing, Linear reciprocating wear motion, Nominally linear motion delamination/wear test, Pin-on-disk evaluation method, Plastic surgical devices/applications, Polymers (surgical applications), Testing methods--surgical implants, Wear testing--surgical implant materials/applications
Significance and Use | ||||||||||||||||
This test method is intended to be performed in conjunction with pin-on-flat wear machines or similar machines that are designed to evaluate simplified specimen geometries. This test method is designed to evaluate combinations of materials with respect to the amount of polymer wear, where quantifiable wear occurs primarily on the polymeric component. With some combinations of materials, significant wear of the counterface may occur, with subsequent embedding of counterface debris particles in the polymer. Such an occurrence will render the weight loss of the polymer specimen unreliable as an indicator of the polymer wear. Wear is reported as volume loss of the polymeric specimen as a function of sliding distance; however, if the sliding distance is not constant across the polymeric specimen surface due to complex motion patterns, wear may be reported as volume loss of the polymeric specimen as a function of wear cycles (in which case a “wear cycle” shall be defined). Volume loss of the polymer specimen is determined by dividing the experimental weight loss by the density of the polymer. For ease of interpretation, wear should be reported as a function of both the number of wear cycles and the sliding distance, when possible. The reference for the comparative evaluation of candidate materials shall be the wear rate of ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) conforming to Specification F648 bearing against counterfaces of cobalt-chromium-molybdenum alloy (in accordance with Specifications F75, F799, or F1537), having prosthetic-quality surface finish and lubricated with bovine blood serum (see 5.2). |
||||||||||||||||
1. Scope | ||||||||||||||||
1.1 This test method describes a laboratory method for evaluating the wear properties of combinations of materials that are being considered for use as bearing surfaces of human total joint prostheses. The body of this test method contains general methods which apply to all types of prosthesis wear applications while individual annexes describe specific wear test methods and clinical validation criteria tailored to each distinct wear application (for example, linear reciprocating motion, ball-cup (“hip-type”) wear, delamination wear, etc.). It is the intent of this test method to rank materials, within each wear application, for polymer wear rates under simulated physiological conditions. It must be recognized, however, that contact geometries and wear motions are simplified using such methods. This test method, therefore, represents only an initial stage in the full wear characterization of a candidate material. 1.2 All candidate materials should be tested in an appropriate joint simulator apparatus using prototype prostheses before being used in clinical trials in patients. The tests described in this test method are used to quickly and reliably screen material combinations for wear performance in different orthopaedic wear applications prior to committing them to more expensive and time-consuming joint simulator testing. In addition, these simplified tests can be used to relate material, surface finish, or other parameters to wear behavior on a more practical basis than is possible in joint simulator tests. 1.3 The values stated in either SI units or inch-pound units are to be regarded separately as standard. The values stated in each system may not be exact equivalents; therefore, each system shall be used independently of the other. Combining values from the two systems may result in non-conformance with the standard. |
||||||||||||||||
2. Referenced Documents | ||||||||||||||||
|
Historical
1.1.2010
Historical
1.12.2010
Historical
1.3.2011
Historical
1.12.2010
Historical
1.12.2010
Historical
1.12.2012
Do you want to make sure you use only the valid technical standards?
We can offer you a solution which will provide you a monthly overview concerning the updating of standards which you use.
Would you like to know more? Look at this page.
Latest update: 2024-12-22 (Number of items: 2 217 000)
© Copyright 2024 NORMSERVIS s.r.o.